Labour markets, human capital and inequality

Structural reforms and income distribution


Main Paper: Structural Reforms and Income Distribution 

Policy Note: Growth and income inequality trends and policy implication

Policy Brief (two pager): Pro-growth reforms: their impact on income inequality and household economic vulnerability

Related working papers:

Causa, O., A. de Serres and N. Ruiz (2014), "Can pro-growth policies lift all boats? An analysis based on household disposable income", OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1180, OECD
Publishing, Paris.

Causa, O., S. Araujo, A. Cavaciuti, N. Ruiz and Z. Smidova, (2014) "A preliminary analysis of income distribution developments", OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1111, OECD Publishing, Paris.


Developments in income inequality have not been uniform across countries. In fact, between the mid-1990s and the late 2000s, OECD countries experienced “inequality convergence”: inequality in household disposable income has tended to fall in the most unequal countries and to rise in the most equal ones. The largest increases in inequality affected Sweden, Denmark and Finland, which nonetheless remain among the most egalitarian countries. The sharpest reductions occurred in Turkey, Mexico and Chile, which started from a high level of inequality.



Related Documents


21点点数一样怎么算 内蒙快3基本走势图 青海快3电子走势图 黑龙江6+1技巧 排列三开奖直播 查一下甘肃快3开奖结果 000031股票行情 长荣慧国际 江西快3官方下载 上海十一选五开奖走势图360 河南快三app 体彩十一选五开奖结果 网上玩极速快三的都输钱没 优发娱乐官网手机网页版 燕赵20选5开奖结果走势图 龙头股份股票 江西快三最新版本下载